Give Me A Rusted Blunt Axe So I Can Butcher CTH To Pieces

OK, excuse me if I seem rude in this article but believe me, it's totally forgivable and justified. People say to hell with a lot of things, I say "Down with chauvinist pigs with too big an ego and too small a brain. In fact, down with all male species out there who think that the presence of an extra tube dangling on their body gives them superiority in any form."
Today, my bro (yes that annoying Lin) told me bout this reader's mail featured in The Star condemning house-husbands. This guy even went to the length of saying the house-husband's son will "probably grow up to be a feminine male and gay before long".
If my dear readers are too blind or slur to comprehend the vulgarity of these words, please scroll up and read it over and over again until it sinks into you. Yes, this fucked-up shithole not only insulted house-husbands, he even threw in a view of disapproval towards gays and (I prefer to call them) metrosexual guys. In fact, I bet he thinks guys who are sensitive towards another person's feelings are wrong too!
OK, here are some quotes from that mail and a few pieces of my mind :
1) What kind of role model would a house-husband be for a growing boy?
Here is an answer to this question that the incompetent brain of that (probably impotent) shitfaced whiner couldn't possibly think off in a gazillion years : The type of role model that says "Regardless of my job, I am a man who is willing to relinquish my job and become your father so that my wife (a woman whom I truly respect) could go out there and get involved in a job she desires to." Kapeesh? Being a house-husband is nothing to be ashamed off or looked down upon. In fact, a man who can willingly become a house-husband is probably more secure and confident of his own sexuality and standing in society than most males! Kudos to all men out there who are brave enough to embrace this new career.
2) Whosoever brings home the bread will inevitably speak louder and have the last say.
Excuse me but what is this shit about having the last say? Doesn't this point towards a largely dysfunctional family where decisions are made upon who can shout the loudest during an argument instead of sitting down and having mature discussions to achieve a decision where all parties are satisfied. You don't have to "get the last say" in things like when a child goes out with his mom and wants to have an ice-cream, you're supposed to have a relationship where both sides are allowed to voice their opinions and are guaranteed respect regardless of how different the views are. Who said that those worthless testosterone swimming around in that jelly that should have been your brain entitles you to "the last say" and that your say, regardless whether it's first or last, is right? I call this total bullshit. The whiner who sent this mail in must be a fucker who can't put 2 and 2 together during a normal conversation so he has to rely on his "last say" authority.
3) We ought to be keeping the status quo.
What status quo? Hello shit-fucker~ what status quo? You're saying this as if women were the evil bad guys plotting to overthrow the male species and that you have to keep the status quo so you will have the bargaining power or messed up shit like that. OK, so what's wrong with (if there comes a time) women actually having a little more authority than men? Is it so wrong? Is it really so unacceptable that women could be as good or better than men?
4) Wives are to submit to their husbands.
Wives are to SUBMIT to their husbands?! FUCK!!!!!! What kinda FUCKED UP theory is that? SUBMIT! WIVES SUBMIT TO HUSBAND?! I think the only other time such an unreasonably stupid remark has ever been featured on a national paper is when some MP said that "Since women can't fight against their rapist, they might as well just give up and ENJOY THEMSELVES." All I can say is FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK.
And don't even get me started on the way this bastard asshole trampled upon feminine guys and gays. Too late, the damage can no longer come undone. Tell me, what is wrong with being gay (when I say gay here I mean bout male and female)? If any of you possess even the slightest IQ to read up on historical books and stuff, you will find that gays have existed as long as the sun and moon. In fact, the Hindu gods even feature a god with bout male and female organs. Greek and Roman emperors have been known to have homosexual partners even through their marriage to the opposite sex. Even the mighty Shakespeare, the person whom we sooo admire, is rumoured to be gay! So obviously homosexuality does not prevent one from achieving greatness, so now tell me, what is wrong with being gay?
Oh yeah, again, if any of you are smart enough to read, you might have noticed an article in Times not long ago that reports the SCIENTIFIC findings of a research on the minds of homosexuals. The report is too long to fit in here so anyone who's interested can just come ask me but to cut a long story short, it basically says the chemical reaction of a homosexual's brain is fundamentally different from that of a normal person's, so the fact is evident, homosexuality is not a choice but rather it is an in-born nature. But what the heck, why am I defending gays? They have done nothing wrong and needs no defending, they are innocent on their own.
By the way, the writer of that mail goes by the alias of CTH from Kuala Lumpur. Get this, this Neanderthal dares bitch about setting a role model and machoism but he is too fucking pussy to even write his full name in here!!!! An advice for that fucker : Go back to your cave and bang your head on the wall until it shatters, after that remember to clean up the mess so that your filthiness will not corrupt this world. Oh wait, what mess? You don't have any brain so it's pretty obvious nothing is going to leak out from your skull.
Here is an applaud to Lin for being one of the few man I know who are smart enough and brave enough to defend women and gays without a shred of insecurity.